Lapland Aurora Photography Tour vs Standard Chase: Do You Need the Professional Photographer?

I did both options myself, and no one tells you that

It was January 12th, minus 22°C, when I got into the minibus at 8:30 pm. Outside, Rovaniemi lay in complete darkness: the sun had risen at 11:30 am and set again at 1:30 pm. I had booked two tours, a week apart, to finally understand what makes the difference: the small, expensive photography tour with a professional or the large, popular standard aurora chase with unlimited mileage.

I grew up in Lapland. My father was a reindeer herder, and I saw the revontulet as a child, but never really photographed them. For this test I wanted to know: is the extra cost for the photographer really worth it, or is the standard tour with a good guide enough? I booked both tours as an ordinary customer, without a discount, without a press pass.

We receive a commission for bookings made through our links on Viator (PID P00303273), at no extra cost to you. This is what keeps the site free. Learn more →

The first tour was the small photography tour with a maximum of 8 people. The second was Rovaniemi's most reviewed aurora chase, with more than 2,500 reviews and an unlimited mileage guarantee. Both promise northern lights. Both deliver, but in completely different ways.

The first night: the professional photography tour (max. 8 people)

Our guide was named Antero, a Finnish photographer who has been chasing the aurora since the 1990s. He had a Nikon D850 around his neck, a tripod under his arm, and a patience that impressed me. We drove about 45 minutes northeast of Rovaniemi, along the Kemijoki, until he found a spot: a clearing with a clear view to the north, no moon, no light pollution.

At 10:37 pm the lights appeared, not the rich green from Instagram, but a pale, whitish band that moved slowly. Antero said, "Weak activity, maybe Kp 2. But the camera will see more than your eye." He was right. He set up my tripod, adjusted the exposure (15 seconds, ISO 1600, aperture 2.8), and explained why my phone would only produce noise under these conditions. Two days later he sent me the edited photos. They showed colors I had never seen with the naked eye: green, purple, even a hint of red on the horizon.

The group consisted of two couples from Germany, a Japanese man traveling alone, and me. We were all beginners, but Antero looked after each of us individually. He changed lenses, adjusted focus, and explained why the aurora sometimes dances and sometimes stands still. At 1:30 am there was hot lingonberry juice from a thermos, and we sat on reindeer hides while the lights slowly faded.

Who this is NOT for: If you just want to see the aurora without dealing with camera settings, and a phone photo is enough for you, this tour is overpriced. You are paying for the expertise of a professional that you won't use.

Why the small tour almost won me over

A week later, on January 19th, I got on the bus for the large tour. This time there were 18 of us, a full minibus. The guide, a young Finn named Mikko, had an unlimited mileage guarantee: he would drive as far as it took to find clear sky, even if that meant 200 km. That sounded good.

We drove north, past Ranua, then on to Palojärvi. Mikko kept checking his phone, not for Instagram, but for satellite images and local weather radar. "It's cloudy in Rovaniemi," he said, "but there's a gap 80 km to the north. We're heading there." And he did. After a 90 minute drive we stopped on a frozen lake. The sky was clear, the temperature was minus 25°C, and at 11:15 pm the aurora appeared as a bright green band that actually danced.

Mikko built a campfire and handed out hot chocolate and sausages. He had a camera with him, a basic DSLR, and offered to take a photo of everyone. But he was not a professional photographer. The pictures he took with my phone were okay, better than nothing, but not comparable to Antero's work. The group was loud and cheerful, but also impatient. Some got back on the bus after 20 minutes because they were cold. They were wearing jeans. At minus 25°C. I sat by the fire, drank hot chocolate, and thought: this is the real Lapland experience. But the photos? Those I would not hang on my wall.

Who this is NOT for: If you want professional shots that you can print or share on social media, this tour will disappoint you. The guide takes snapshots, not art.

The second night: the standard chase with unlimited mileage

I had booked the standard tour with more than 2,500 reviews because it has a strong success rate in Rovaniemi. The guide really did drive 120 km that evening until we found a gap in the clouds. That is the decisive advantage: unlimited mileage. The small tours often drive only 30 to 40 km and stay close to the city. If it's cloudy there, you're out of luck. Mikko drove until he found what he was looking for.

The aurora was stronger that evening, Kp 3, Mikko said. The band was green, with a light pink along the lower edge. I could see it with the naked eye, not just as a pale shimmer but as an actually glowing curve. The group cheered. Mikko took photos of everyone, but the quality was limited: my pictures had noise, the colors were washed out, and the focus was off. I deleted them later.

What sets this tour apart is the guarantee: if you don't see the aurora, you get your money back or can come back for free. That gives you peace of mind. But the price is lower, around 80 to 100 euros per person, and you can feel that in the level of attention. Mikko was friendly, but he could not explain camera settings to 18 people at once. He focused on those who asked. The others just stood there and watched.

Who this is NOT for: If small groups, individual attention, and professional photos matter to you, you will feel like a number here. This tour is built for crowds.

The moment that sealed my decision

It was January 25th when I received the photos from Antero. I opened the email and saw a picture of me standing at the tripod, the aurora a green and violet spiral above me, the trees silhouetted black. The image was sharp, true to color, almost surreal. I printed it and put it in a frame. It now hangs in my living room.

Then I looked at Mikko's phone photos. They were blurry, the aurora a green smear, the stars smudged. I deleted all but one: a keepsake photo of me at the campfire, where the aurora shows up only as a bright smudge in the background.

The decision depends on what you want. Do you want to see the aurora with your own eyes, feel the cold, sit by the fire, and tell stories? Then take the standard tour. It is cheaper, has a higher success rate because of the unlimited mileage, and you meet more people. But if you want to come home and say, "Look, I took this photo myself," then invest in the small photography tour. Antero taught me how to capture the aurora, and I have photos that I will show my grandchildren.

I chose the small tour. Not because it is "better," but because it suits me. I am a photographer, and I want quality. But I understand anyone who chooses the standard tour. It is the practical choice.

What I wish I had known beforehand

Here are the things nobody told me, the ones that make the difference between a good aurora night and a disappointing one:

• The aurora never looks the way it does on Instagram. With the naked eye you mostly see pale white or green arcs. The rich colors only come through with a long exposure. Prepare yourself for that, or you will be disappointed.
• Clothing is everything. I watched people in jeans and down jackets last about an hour at minus 25°C before fleeing to the bus. Wear wool base layers (merino), a fleece jacket, a windproof outer layer, insulated boots, and a hat that covers your ears. No cotton: cotton soaks through and freezes.
• Bring a power bank. Lithium batteries drain within minutes at minus 20°C. My phone went from 80 percent to 5 percent after 20 minutes outside. A power bank in an inside pocket keeps it warm.
• Ask about the mileage guarantee. Good tours drive as far as it takes to find clear sky. The cheap tours stay close to the city and often fail. Before booking, ask: "How far do you drive at most?" If the answer is "30 km," book somewhere else.
• The prime time is September through March. But September and October often have more cloud cover. January through March are the most reliable months for clear skies and strong aurora activity.
• The guide matters more than the tour. A good guide knows the local weather conditions, the right spots, and the aurora forecast. Ask about the guide's experience. Antero has been chasing the aurora for 30 years. Mikko for 5. You can tell.

And one more thing: don't book the cheapest tour. I have friends who paid 40 euros for an aurora chase and sat on a crowded bus that drove 15 km and parked in a bank of clouds. They saw nothing. The tour refused to refund their money. With reputable operators you pay 80 to 150 euros, but you get a real chance and a money back guarantee.